The Gerontologist Advance Access originally published online on July 2, 2009
The Gerontologist 2009 49(5):635-650; doi:10.1093/geront/gnp071
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quits and Job Changes Among Home Care Workers in Maine: The Role of Wages, Hours, and Benefits
2 Edmund S. Muskie School of Public Service, Public Policy Analysis, University of Southern Maine, Portland
1 Address correspondence to Lisa Morris, PhD, Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine, Wishcamper Building, P.O. Box 9300, Portland, ME 04104-9300. E-mail: lmorris{at}usm.maine.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
Purpose: Figuring out how to make home care jobs more attractive has become a top policy priority. This study investigates the impact of wages, hours, and benefits on the retention of home care workers. Design and Methods: Using a 2-wave survey design and a sample of home care workers from Maine, the factors associated with turnover intentions, actual turnover, and job-to-job transitions are examined. The analysis uses actual data on hours, wages, and benefits at current and subsequent jobs and controls for perceived rewards and work conditions, personal characteristics, and local labor market conditions. Results: Although the analysis finds that improved work conditions and non-pecuniary rewards of home-based direct care work have significant negative effects on turnover intentions, compensation accounts for more actual job turnover. Higher wages, more hours, and travel cost reimbursement are found to be significantly associated with reduced turnover. Although wages and hours appear to have stronger effects, health benefits do appear to have some significance in predicting job-to-job transitions. Implication: Although improving compensation presents budgetary challenges to home care agencies, for this low-income workforce, the ability to earn higher wages and work more hours may be more of an imperative than improved work conditions.
Keywords: Wages, Benefits, Turnover, Analysis—regression models, Long-term Care, Workforce issues
Received November 11, 2008; Accepted March 16, 2009